A Rejoinder to Mr. Dempster Yallah's Editorial Letter


By: Theodore Hodge



The Perspective
Atlanta, Georgia
September 5, 2014

                  


Dr Amos Sawyer

Mr. Dempster Yallah has accused me of "incendiary vitriol". In Liberian parlance, I'm "going 'round cussing people." My people, dat lie yah. I ain't cuss nobody. Backstabber dat not cuss. To be fair, I think it's an apt description of what Dr. Amos Claudius Sawyer has become to his benefactor, President Ellen Johnson Sirleaf. Mr. Yallah himself proves me right as we shall see later.

Secondly, Mr. Yallah describes me as a "self-proclaimed venerable Liberian journalist". I've made no such claim. Perhaps Mr. Yallah gets the impression I'm a fine writer; I've been told that, especially lately. But does that make me venerable? Oh boy, don't let the high praise swell my head.

Now to the crux of the matter at hand. I penned an article in which I admitted to getting some information through the grapevine. He disparages me for using the rumor-mill or gossip for the background of an article. He jumps through one hoop after another to rebuke and chastise me. In the end he writes surprisingly: "In the realm of full disclosure Mr. Hodge, I too was on that now 'infamous teleconference' with Dr. Sawyer on Saturday, August 30..."

Were we in a court of law, and I were the prosecuting attorney, I would roast his derriere (that's how the French call buttocks) in front of the jury. A series of questions would begin: Do you now admit that a teleconference was indeed organized and attended by Dr. Amos Claudius Sawyer? What was the nature or purpose of the teleconference? Did you (attendees) discuss Dr. Sawyer's role in the Sirleaf administration? Is it true that Dr. Sawyer said his committee (the Good Governance Commission has made many suggestions and recommendations which the Sirleaf administration has failed to implement? Didn't Dr. Sawyer say specifically his recommendations "sit on the president's desk"? Did you in fact discuss some aspects of an interim government and the possible resignation of the president? Several other questions would follow, but you do get the gist. (Bear in mind, others have since surfaced with additional details of the telephone meeting.)

The first person to dispute and dismiss what I wrote is named Sylvester Moses. He claims to have once been a chief security officer to Dr. Sawyer during his tenure as Interim President. He claims both he and his wife had dinner with Dr. Sawyer and his wife at the home of the latter, and that Dr. Sawyer never participated in any teleconference that night. So much so for security; he must eat crow now and I hope he chokes. Mr. Yallah, please tell Mr. Moses that indeed a teleconference was held that evening and Dr. Sawyer did attend. You see, the news from the grapevine tends to be right from time to time; this is one of those times, for the record. (Mr. Moses, your old chief either did not consider you significant enough to invite you, or you deliberately lie to cover him... but the truth comes out as always.)

 

Mr. Yallah vehemently disputes my version of the story yet he does not tell us what the teleconference was all about. Does this not raise some suspicion? If this doesn't reek of a cover-up, then what does? After all, we all know by now that Dr. Sawyer was excused from returning to Liberia immediately along with other officials. Dr. Sawyer was eventually given an exemption for medical reasons. Was the teleconference part of his medical treatment? Was he in fact meeting with his medical specialists and care-givers? In short, again, what was the purpose of the teleconference? Mr. Yallah beats around the bush and dodges the question. We know why.

In the article to which Mr. Yallah pens his rejoinder, I made no mention of VP Boakai's meeting with President Obama. Why is it necessary to discuss it here? As for rumors regarding others who may want to seek the president's resignation, I've given no credence to such a case. Again, one wonders why Mr. Yallah would delve into the matter here. That's because he's trying to cleverly avoid the issue under discussion.

True to their type of scholarly writing, Mr. Yallah uses a lot of pretentious words but like the old saying goes, "He's talking loud and saying nothing". He claims my ambition was to become Information Minister in 2006. Sinister as that may sound, Mr. Yallah may actually be giving me a vote of confidence. He is indirectly saying I'm good enough to have been appointed to the post. Given the number of people who have held that post, including the present holder of the office, I think I compare quite favorable. I would think myself of being a capable candidate for the position. Thank you, Mr. Yallah, for the indirect support. As to what I would have done after winning the position, well, that's a different matter upon which we must differ.

In the end, Mr. Yallah tops his own ludicrousness. He claims I'm President Tubman's son. Kru people say "Chay!" I would have been proud except that this would dishonor my parents, both of whom are deceased. Had my father been alive and this brought to his attention, that Grebo man would have ordered one of his many sons to give you a butt-whipping. No, Mr. Yallah, I had no relation to the president except that we both hailed from Maryland County. The other things you had to say about him violated your claim to deportment. Why you would drag the gentleman through the mud in this particular discussion, just to defend your Lord is laughable. Remember, President Tubman died over forty-three years ago. It is not his administration under discussion but the present one on which your idol might have his eye... trying to stab his benefactor in the back. May the dead rest in peace, yours and mine.

In one of my articles I said clearly that people like the former professors I named made strong impressions on you, their students, during your youth. Psychologically, many of you remain emotionally attached to them forever. You consider them demi-gods. They are your leaders forever and you their followers and disciples. I was right. Dr. Sawyer has such a hold on you that it is impossible to extricate yourself from him; you still think of him as a larger-than-life figure. That's fine, but it blinds you to reality. You came to defend him, but your emotions overwhelmed you. In the end, you did not do yourself justice. I'm sure there will be others lined up to continue the line of attack you started; I await the challenge as I'm confident I can dispatch them as quickly and effectively as I dispatch you now.

One last thing. Tell them to come prepared and not bring a pen-knife to a gun fight. As for you, my friend... and you know we're friends, stick to the social work business. Detroit is going through some tough times now. There should be plenty of work for you there. Leave this fight to others; you've done your part and miserably failed. Thank you.



Anthony Cofrancesco
Thank you Mr. Hodge, you have eloquently laid this man out in quick dispatch.
Anthony Cofrancesco at 07:14AM, 2014/09/05.
Tolo Bonah Corfah
Mr. Hodge,
I have followed and admired some of your writings in the perspective news magazine fora long time now, but I do not see my way clear with this one; how did Dr. Sawyer become a backstabber? I've read the article twice and still don't see how Dr. Sawyer is a backstabber. I've have also read Dr. Sawyer' letter to Frontpage Africa online news organ, but don't see any backstabbing. I didn't attained the teleconference under discussion, but I can not fathom how Dr. Sawyer would one thing at a given telecom fence and say another thing in a letter to a news paper.
Please stop getting your information from the "grapevine", or EL They Say, as you have been objective in most of your writings, just saying
Regards,
Tolo Bonah Corfah
Tolo Bonah Corfah at 09:33AM, 2014/09/05.
Ted Allison


Mr. Tolo Bonah Corfah, you probably missed it. Mr. Dempster Yallah did admit that Dr. Sawyer was at the teleconference, so did Yanqui Zayzay in his new article. Read it. The teleconference did discuss the president's performance in office and the mechanics of a possible regime change. So what else is there to deny?

Mr. Hodge did admit to getting the news tip from the "grapevine", but does that mean he's wrong? He wrote what he was told and it has already been confirmed twice by people who attended the teleconference. Who cares what Sawyer wrote to Front Page Africa? The cat is out of the bag now. Let Sawyer answer the charge. He's a backstabber; I agree with Mr. Hodge.
Ted Allison at 09:59AM, 2014/09/05.
Kandajaba Zoebohn Zoejallah
Tolo, don´t tell us you are still the gullible follower you and others were behind the likes of Tipoteh, Sawyer, Dew Mayson, etc in the early seventies when you used to walk from town to LPMC to print propaganda from and for these same crooks especially Tipoteh whom you few years ago referred to as a dictator for which George Klay Kieh, you Wolokollie and others had to walk away from LPP!

How on earth you did not attend the teleconference but still put your neck on the chopping board that Sawyer is not a back stabber!? We did not expect such from you Tolo, considering the fact that you are of age now with some advanced education and not the same as when in the early eighties you were busy recruiting the people children in Bomi Hills for your "TIPO" (and his LPP) as you referred to Tipoteh then.

To make long matter short, stop making small of yourself when you know to your conscience that everything Mr. Hodge is saying here are things you yourself have said both in private and in public about Sawyer for they are simply the truth and nothing but the truth that Sawyer is a back stabber!

Again, Tolo, How on earth you did not attend the teleconference but still put your neck on the chopping board that Sawyer is not a back stabber!? Do you think George Klay Kieh or Dusty Wolokolie would ever defend the likes of Sawyer? No! And you know it.

You are a few years older than Kieh and he would not belittle himself. As for Dusty Wolokolie who and you might be of the same age, you know neither of these selfish hypocrites would ever dream of him Dusty Wolokolie coming to the defense of their notorious back-stabbing nature. So back off!!! Or else....? A hint to the wise is quite....?
Kandajaba Zoebohn Zoejallah at 02:05PM, 2014/09/05.
T. Nathaniel Tamba 111
Thank you Mr. Hodge, for proving your case with the required preponderance of evidence and also the proof beyond all reasonable doubt that Sawyer is a back stabber and that Yallah´s interloping is simply the obvious of a disciple who believes his relevance depends on his master - Sawyer the back stabber.
T. Nathaniel Tamba 111 at 02:23PM, 2014/09/05.
Joshua Zoejallah
It is interesting how people spew these silly remarks at others' characters and don't have the temerity to stand by them publicly by attaching their real names to what they say. Little do they realize how we can tell from their dictions exactly who is writing such nonsense. Bunch of Cowards!
Joshua Zoejallah at 03:22PM, 2014/09/05.
Amos Frank
Joshua (even if this is OR not your real name), how can readers confirm that the name you have here is your real name or NOT your real name, or how can you prove that the names you are referring to are not real names? Or should readers upon reading your comment conclude you are a "coward writing such nonsense"? Your empty last line: "Little do they realize how we can tell from their dictions exactly who is writing such nonsense. Bunch of Cowards!" is as useless as the purpose of your comment, for could you "tell" your comment won´t be this useless.
Amos Frank at 03:27PM, 2014/09/07.

Post your comment

You can use following HTML tags: <a><br><strong><b><em><i><blockquote><pre><code><img><ul><ol><li><del>

Confirmation code:

Comments script


© 2014 by The Perspective
E-mail: editor@theperspective.org
To Submit article for publication, go to the following URL: submittingarticles@theperspective.org