Crying Sovereignty,
Trusteeship, And All This And That…
By Gbe Sneh
The Perspective
Atlanta, Georgia
July 8, 2005
|
To all detractors to the action plan, who can point to any single era where an administration had reasonable control over the country’s revenue base? See what is going on as we debate:
NPA
Bribery and corruption has been the order of the day
since the first cargo ship docked at the Free Port.
We have broad-day-light evasion of customs where goods
destined for the Port are dumped out at sea and recovered
by hired local fishermen. Bales of Marijuana, Fanti
lappa, you add your own goods. What have we really
gained from the current management scheme at the National
Port Authority (NPA) ?
RIA
Over the years, Roberts International Airport has
been nothing more than a smugglers’ hub. Whether
one’s cargo, and oh yes, even one’s suitcase
containing personal effects, gets opened and ransacked,
depends on his/her willingness, or lack there of,
to fork up a negotiated bribe sum. Incoming mail gets
sorted here rather than at the Post Office. Mail is
put through the “bright-light-test“, and
those that pass the test never make it to their destinations.
BMA
Revenues from the Bureau of Maritime Affairs have
been notoriously proclaimed slush funds, petty cash
for the head of state.
CBL
Inefficiency plagues this functionary. It only knows
to pay its do-nothing officers and board members hefty
salaries and allowances. We all saw that flushed out
into the open, culminating in the resignation of the
gang leader.
All of a sudden some among us are advocating a selective application of the Comprehensive Peace Accord. It is pervasively expressed throughout the CPA document that wherever or whenever necessary, the international partners should be engaged to provide expertise to any set up functionary. Of course we signed the peace document. Why all this not even applicable “sovereignty cry”. The determining question is, is the proposed action plan to rescue or revamp crucial functionaries - NPA, RIA, CBL, BMA, FDA - that to date have proven to be dysfunctional following a slue of audits and investigations warranted? The answer, of course, is YES. Just ask any Liberian on the side-walk, or any international friend, for that matter.
There is one recurring phrase in LEGAP that seems to be stepping on the sore toe of many of the detractors to the action plan, and hence their “sovereignty cry”. Here it is: “deploying international experts with signature authority”. Now let’s deal with that. These experts would be working alongside Liberians in a partnership capacity. Would we rather have their stamp of approval or sole signatures of their Liberian counterparts? Who really would be in charge here? To want the latter is to want a mere rubber stamp. Sorry, that would be inappropriate. And that would be unacceptable to the people.
Annex II: Technical Annex
1. Securing Liberia’s Revenue Base
3. Since the challenge is to revamp dysfunctional
systems and processes in the these agencies, it is
essential that Management Contracts for these institutions
be awarded for a period of time to be defined with
agreed upon milestones for measuring results. These
would be awarded on the basis of international competitive
bidding so that global expertise can be obtained for
upgrading these agencies. This is essential since
it is recognized that only by introducing modern management
practices and processes will make these agencies sustainable
in the long term. The recommendations from the EC
financed audits of the NPA, RIA, FDA, LPRC, BMA, CBL
and BCE should be taken into account when drawing
up the terms of reference for these Management Contracts.
The foregoing passage from LEGAP should be music to any Liberian’s ear, and not to draw tears of any fowl play - Trusteeship, invasion of sovereignty, and all that. And music it will be. All this talk about the Chairman threatening to resign because of the plan, if that indeed is true, would be like wasting palm butter on our pussawa. A confidant once said that the Chairman uses “soft voice” to get his aims across. We are listening. Come on, serve the meal and let the people chop, for once.
Let’s work out any perceived kinks and move ahead with the plan of economic action. It is a sensible way forward; it’s long overdue.